Privacy è un termine inglese che evoca significati a volte mutevoli, accostabile al concetto di “riservatezza”. Nella realtà contemporanea, con il concetto di privacy non si intende soltanto il diritto di essere lasciati in pace o di proteggere la propria sfera privata, ma soprattutto il diritto di controllare l’uso e la circolazione dei propri dati personali che costituiscono il bene primario dell’attuale società dell’informazione.
Privacy
In questa sezione puoi trovare una raccolta di tutte le fonti e informazioni giuridiche più rilevanti in materia di Privacy organizzate per tipologia e giurisdizione.
The 'social norm' of privacy has evolved over time.
Mark Zuckerberg
Risorse giuridiche in materia di Privacy
Normativa
Unione Europea
- Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU
- European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
- Council Decision of 13 July 2010 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the European Union to the United States for the purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (TFTP Agreement)
- Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws
- Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters
- Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector
- Regulation (EC) 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18. December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data
- Application to the EFTA countries Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein under the EEA AGREEMENT – Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 83/1999 of 25 June 1999 amending Protocol 37 and Annex XI (Telecommunication services) to the EEA Agreement OJ L 296/41, of 23.11.2000
- Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
A livello internazionale
- Council of Europe, Convention 108 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, 1981
- Council of Europe, Explanatory Report to the Convention 108 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, 1981
- Council of Europe, Recommendation No. R (87) 15 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States regulating the Use of Personal Data in the Police Sector, 1987
- Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the European Agreement on the Transmission of Applications for Legal Aid, 2001
- United Nations, Universal declaration of human rights, 1948, art. 12
- United Nations, International covenant on civil and political rights, 1966, art. 17
Altri provvedimenti
- European Data Protection Supervisor, Annual Report 2017
- European Commission, Mythbuster: What Commission proposals on data protection DO and DON’T mean
- European Commission, Data Protection Factsheet
- European Commission, Decisions on the adequacy of the protection of personal data in third countries, relating to:
- Andorra:
- Argentina:
- Canada:
- Switzerland:
- Faeroe Islands:
- Guernsey: decision 2003/821/EC, opinion 5/2003
- State of Israel: decision 2011/61/EU, opinion 6/2009
- Isle of Man: decision 2004/411/EC, opinion 6/2003
- Jersey: decision 2008/393/EC, opinion 8/2007
- New Zealand: decision 2013/65/EU, opinion 11/2011
- United States (EU-US Privacy Shield): decision 2016/1250/EU, opinion 01/2016
– Guide to the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
– Case C-362/14, Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner
– Communication on Transatlantic Data Flows: Restoring Trust through Strong Safeguards, COM (2016) 117
-
- Eastern Republic of Uruguay: decision 2012/484/EU, opinion 6/2010
- European Commission, Model contracts for the transfer of personal data to third countries
- Information Commissioner’s Office, Big data, artificial intelligence, machine learning and data protection, 2017
- London Economics, Study on the economic benefits of privacy‐enhancing technologies (PETs), Report to the European Commission, 2010
- LRDP KA TOR Ltd, Comparative study on different approaches to new privacy challenges, in particular in the light of technological developments, Report to the European Commission, 2010
- LRDP KA TOR Ltd, The challenges to European data protection laws and principles, Working paper no. 1 for the European Commission, 2010
- LRDP KA TOR Ltd, Data protection laws in the EU, Working paper no. 2 for the European Commission, 2010
- OECD, Recommendation of the Council on digital security risk management for economic and social prosperity, 2015
- OECD, Guidelines for the security of Information systems and networks: towards a culture of security, 2002
Giurisprudenza
Unione europea
- C-362/14- Schrems
- C-201/14 – Bara and Others
- Joined cases C-141/12 and C-372/12 – YS and Others
- C-683/13 – Pharmacontinente – Saúde e Higiene and Others
- C-131/12 – Google v Costeja González
- Joined cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 – Digital Rights Ireland, Seitlinger and Others
- C-288/12 – Commission v Hungary
- T-214/11 – ClientEarth and PAN Europe v EFSA (on appeal)
- C-486/12
- C-473/12 – IPI
- C-342/12 – Worten
- C-291/12 – Schwarz
- C-119/12 Josef Probst v mr.nexnet GmbH
- C-614/10 European Commission v Republic of Austria (judgement of 16 October 2012)
- T-190/10 – Egan and Hackett v Parliament
- European Court of Justice: Joined Cases C‑468/10 and C‑469/10 – Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito (ASNEF) (C‑468/10), Federación de Comercio Electrónico y Marketing Directo (FECEMD) (C‑469/10) v Administración del Estado
- T-82/09 – Dennekamp v Parliament
- C-461/10 – Bonnier Audio AB, Earbooks AB, Norstedts Förlagsgrupp AB, Piratförlaget AB, Storyside AB v Perfect Communication Sweden AB
- C-70/10 – Scarlet Extended SA v Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs SCRL (SABAM) (judgement of 24 November 2011)
- C-92/09 and C-93/09 – Volker und Markus Schecke GbR (C-92/09), Hartmut Eifert (C-93/09) v Land Hessen
- C-28/08 P – European Commission v The Bavarian Lager Co. Ltd, European Data Protection Supervisor
- C-518/07 European Commission supported by European Data Protection Supervisor v Federal Republic of Germany
- C-553/07 College van burgemeester en wethouders van Rotterdam v M.E.E. Rijkeboer Netherlands
- C-524/06 Heinz Huber v Bundesrepublik Germany
- C-73/07 Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy, Satamedia Oy
- C-101/01 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Göta hovrätt: Bodil Lindqvist
Dottrina
- Bassini M., La tutela degli indirizzi IP dinamici e la privacy digitale, Quaderni costituzionali, 2017, 1, 165-169
- Dagnino E., Una questione di fiducia: la reputazione ai tempi delle piattaforme “online” tra diritto alla “privacy” e prospettive di mercato, Diritto delle relazioni industriali, 2017, 1, 247-252
- Bifulco R., La sentenza Schrems e la costruzione del diritto europeo alla “privacy”, Giurisprudenza costituzionale, 2016, 1, 289-307
- De Tullio M.F., La “privacy” e i “big data” verso una dimensione costituzionale collettiva, Politica del diritto, 2016, 4, 637-696
- Frosini T.E., Costituzionalismo 2.0, Relazione al convegno “Costituzionalismo e futuro”, Rassegna Parlamentare, 2016, 4, 673-692
- Pallone E.C., “Internet of things” e l’importanza del diritto alla “privacy” tra opportunità e rischi, Ciberspazio e Diritto, 2016, 1-2, 163-183
- Pellero B., Tutela del segreto delle comunicazioni e sorveglianza elettronica nell’era dei “social network” e dell'”internet” delle cose, Gnosis, 2016, 2, 128-137
- Pizzonia D. e Sitzia A., Il controllo del datore di lavoro su Internet e posta elettronica: quale riservatezza sul luogo di lavoro?, La Nuova Giurisprudenza Civile Commentata, 2016, 6(1), 901-908
- Carta M., Diritto alla vita privata ed Internet nell’esperienza giuridica europea ed internazionale, Il Diritto dell’informazione e dell’informatica, 2014, 1, 1-19
- Falletti E., Cassazione e Corte di giustizia alle prese con la tutela della privacy sui servizi di Google, il Corriere giuridico, 2014, 6, 802-810
